Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: staytrue

I have to think more on that, for my other questions, but, wouldn't that heavy weight out in space be, well ? weightless ?


35 posted on 08/18/2005 11:51:20 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Prophet in the wilderness

I should have said "large Mass" instead of large weight.


37 posted on 08/19/2005 12:04:08 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

you're confusing weight with mass.
as much as i love the idea of the space elevator, i wouldn't expect anyone to build one for another hundred years, even if the nanotube technology is available now. It's rather expensive, sort of dangerous (imagine a long rope falling from the sky encircling the globe and leaving a wake of destruction around it's circumference. i read too much sci-fi i guess), and also complicated. On the plus side it would make getting into and out of orbit easy as pie.


38 posted on 08/19/2005 12:05:09 AM PDT by Nipplemancer (Abolish the DEA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson