To: mercy
If I had to guess at the identity of the general, I'd lean toward Merrill McPeak.
To: william clark
"If I had to guess at the identity of the general, I'd lean toward Merrill McPeak."
I know a couple of former AF generals (MGs) and I can tell you they have a very low regard for McPeak, as do several others who knew him. If he was around the AD story, I'd have to agree.
23 posted on
08/18/2005 7:07:34 PM PDT by
Cautor
To: william clark
If I had to guess at the identity of the general, I'd lean toward Merrill McPeak. I would be willing to go "all in" that you're right....he's a total a-hole.
34 posted on
08/18/2005 7:18:48 PM PDT by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
To: william clark
"If I had to guess at the identity of the general, I'd lean toward Merrill McPeak."
Why should the ID of this General remain a secret?
He must know who it is? The General knows knows who he's talking about so why can't we know? May there is a BS factor going on here.
93 posted on
08/18/2005 8:35:25 PM PDT by
WHBates
To: william clark
Talked with a former Centcom guy the other day. He said they knew nothing of the Able Danger program.
But I wouldn't think they would. It seems to me that their job is to deal with military operations after the fact, not the preventive intelligence which protects us quietly day to day.
139 posted on
08/19/2005 3:47:25 AM PDT by
ovrtaxt
(Logic test: Pearl Harbor is to 911 as Harry Truman is to .....)
To: william clark
Good morning.
"...Merrill McPeak."
I had forgotten about him. What a swine. Whoever the general is, you may be sure he is a clintonista.
Michael Frazier
175 posted on
08/19/2005 10:32:17 AM PDT by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson