[bvw]

A person who owns a Ford calls a Chevy a mish-mosh. And vice-versa. Not that the design of life and the universe is a mish-mosh as you or my analogy taken too simply might suggest -- but that the viewpoint that a person takes is awfully subjective. Your calling DNA a mish-mosh is premature at least. Not you nor anyone else knows enough of the whole interlinked network of chemistry and mechanics in the cell, of the cells in a organism, of the organism in a eco-system to objectively make such a statement. Perhaps it is premature conclusion derived from subconscious prejudices you entertain. A blindspot in objectivity. You don't seem to want to be appreciating the full warp and weave of the fabric of life. Why not? Perhaps because you like the easier premature judgement. Who knows? You have your reasons -- to reach objectivity it might be helpful for you to know, for you to discover, for you to self-examine for what those factors within you and your own history are. But not necessary -- all that's necessary is that you abandon the premature bias. To be able to say you don't yet know-it-all.

[Servant of the 9]

Your calling DNA a mish-mosh is premature at least. Not you nor anyone else knows enough of the whole interlinked network of chemistry and mechanics in the cell, of the cells in a organism, of the organism in a eco-system to objectively make such a statement.

No, I am saying my God can do a lot better than as design we are only one generation away from surpassing.

Read Derbyshire's Article

Money Quote, speaking of the God of Inteligent Design "Their God is a science-fiction God, a high-I.Q. space alien plodding along a decade or two ahead of our understanding. The God of Judaism and Christianity is infinitely vaster and stranger than that, and far above our poking, groping inquiries into the furniture of our rocky little daytime cosmos."

So9