It is easy to strike a nerve. Just be an annoying jerk and you will strike a nerve - I know how to do that perfectly well myself. But, that doesn't mean that your points struck a nerve, merely that your presentation struck a nerve. There's a difference.
This is not substantive response, nor does it address my points.
Sure it did. Most of your points were a fantasy concocted in your own mind. I stated that quite clearly. There is nothing further to say about them because I wasn't arguing any of that to begin with. You are battling the demons of your own imagination, and you don't need me for that.
It is just blathering informed by little else that egoism. That ego is the driver is amply demostrated by that fact that you somehow think that i was merely addressing you and what you said when it was quite clear who I was talking about ansd where my focus was directed.
Whatever. I quote from your post post #164:
Really, you evos and IDers...
Besides, you make it sound...
On one have you seem...
...and on the other you seem to be saying...
You cannot have it both ways...
...and you evos do not help your cause...
Do you really think...
Do you really think...
I think that you are falling...
...I will tell you that the stridency and seemingly mortification of you evos becomes you little ...
Prior postings of your is rather off point. There is nothing to respond too as there is nothing in this response but personal attacks and psychobabble.
Your silly posturings and inane protestations mean nothing to me. I could care less if you wish to address me directly or obliquely, but I do think it's pathetic for you to retreat into claims that you are not addressing me when you are. As for the material that was indirectly attributed to me by association, there is nothing to say to that except that it's not my position, and I have clearly stated so.
Moreover, I have not personally attacked you until now. If you thought anything I wrote before was a personal attack, then you are clearly too delicate to safely participate in an online political forum, much less in these evolution/creationism threads. I would recommend crocheting. Furthermore, the only "psychobabble" I've seen has come from you and no one else, at least so far as our discussion. Your post linked above is nothing but psychobabble.
Man, you seem annoyed. But I don't think the issue has much political traction myself, in part because it is confined to places where the majority are in tune with their elected officials trying to maneuver under the Constitutional wire SCOTUS has set on this one. Stem cells have more, not because of an attack on science issue thingie, but rather because folks want to live forever, and want to perceive that the Ponce de Leon Fountain of Youth seems to be just over the embryonic stem cell horizon.
Too funny
You should listen to yourself - you think that is reasoned discourse? Just more invective, hand waving and psychobabble.
Again, nothing substantive.
let me repeat myself:
But drop me a note when you have something meaningful to say, just spare me the hectoring, please. It does not have the effect on of me that you evidently are looking for.
It is just nettlesome, I doubt that you could insult me.
Oh, an inclusive, "plural" use of the English pronoun "You" is quite acceptable, as you should well know. My meaning is clearly stated by my phrase:
Really, you evos and IDers.
Honestly.
You are just proving my point about how "you people" (perhaps you would prefer "Youse guys") with all of these attacks on anyone that disagrees with "you"in any form whatsoever. "You" may chose not to believe me, but "the public" finds this irksome. But go ahead, perhaps they will find "you" as impressive as you find "yourselves." (Note the plural usage here.)
You know, if you actually worked in an real, professional scientific institution and tried this tactic, you would get fired.
But then you would not know about that, now would you? (now here I mean it in the singular)