[js1138]

Fundamentally, evolution relies on the hypothesis that all life forms (or certainly most life forms) trend to higher complexity.

This is a fundamentally incorrect characterization of evolution.

[visually_augmented]

js1138: This is a fundamentally incorrect characterization of evolution.

How so? If man evolved from primate, I assume you would say that this is a step in the higher complexity direction? How does a troglodyte become modern man? Is this not a move toward complexity. How do single cell creatures become multi-cell? The whole foundation of Darwinism must rely on this assumption. Can you name a creature that has de-volved??? Is de-evolution the norm?? Please explain in more detail my improper assumptions...