To: Jeff Head
Darwin's own theories has also been shown to have flaws
Such as?
In that regard, IMHO, in such matters, flawed does not necessarily mean out of the question...or even wrong.
The problem isn't that ID is "proven wrong". I've never said that it has been. The problem is that the "evidence" pushed for ID is universally flawed or wrong-headed, and, unlike any scientific theory (including evolution), there is no hypothetical way to prove Intelligent Design wrong.
316 posted on
08/18/2005 8:11:20 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
wrong-headed That doesn't seem very scientific. :)
Look, we could go on all night and I have no disposition to do so. You asked for some of the science behind ID. I provided it.
Thanks for the reasoned dialog.
321 posted on
08/18/2005 8:15:43 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Dimensio
Darwin's own theories has also been shown to have flaws
Such as?
Are you suggesting there are no flaws in Darwin's theories?
434 posted on
08/18/2005 10:43:04 PM PDT by
mordo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson