Do you view the effort by these (quasi-?) governmental bodies to update their rosters as good news? I do, even if I'm a bit unsettled that such records are so out of date.
I don't see it as good or bad, necessarily. I see it as fundamental to being able to implement the law though. The law, as written, included an agressive schedule for accomplishing the required tasks. If they waited for the law to be enacted, they would never be able to meet the schedule.
I wonder who is paying for the Rose Institute? Who are they accountable to? Will their process and records be made public? (Just a few questions that go through my mind when reading this stuff).
FYI, actions being performed by quasi-governmental bodies, often unaccountable, always bothers me.