Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stark reality of the American dream (barf? funny? i don't even know)
BBC ^ | 8/18/05 | Humphrey Hawksley

Posted on 08/18/2005 9:14:42 AM PDT by minus_273

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: facedown
Cool, one before the ZOT and one aprés. A ZOT sandwich!
41 posted on 08/18/2005 10:05:35 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: facedown

I saw it first! (Post #8)


42 posted on 08/18/2005 10:06:30 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Officially around the bend, at least for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Doctor
There there, kitty, you'll get your lunch soon.


43 posted on 08/18/2005 10:07:03 AM PDT by varyouga (Reformed Kerry voter (I know, I'm a frickin' idiot))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Doctor

WHOA! A little harsh, doc...

As for the report that this article was based on...I say hogwash...it is far to complicated an issue to say it is easier to move "up" in Europe or Canada than it is here...


44 posted on 08/18/2005 10:09:59 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
"If you are born into poverty in the US," said one of its authors, "you are actually more likely to remain in poverty than in other countries in Europe, the Nordic countries, even Canada, which you would think would not be that different."

People born into poverty in the US would be rich if they lived in Europe.

45 posted on 08/18/2005 10:10:19 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Well I called in the Mod! So ha!
46 posted on 08/18/2005 10:11:31 AM PDT by RedBeaconNY (Vous parlez trop, mais vous ne dites rien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RedBeaconNY

I called Conspiracy Guy and Darksheare!


47 posted on 08/18/2005 10:12:31 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Officially around the bend, at least for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
In the spirit of Doctor Doctor (may he rest in peace)...


48 posted on 08/18/2005 10:15:44 AM PDT by RedBeaconNY (Vous parlez trop, mais vous ne dites rien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RedBeaconNY

49 posted on 08/18/2005 10:16:47 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Officially around the bend, at least for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Fluffy hasn't eaten for a while...

50 posted on 08/18/2005 10:18:52 AM PDT by RedBeaconNY (Vous parlez trop, mais vous ne dites rien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RedBeaconNY

Nice kitty!


51 posted on 08/18/2005 10:20:00 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Officially around the bend, at least for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: facedown
And now, back to discussion of the topic. One factor that I'm interested in is the impact of immigration on the situation in the U.S. and Britain, where it's comparatively easy to come in and start a business. Does competition from these immigrants make it harder for the "underclasses" to move up?

Another question - when I quickly read the report on "Intergenerational mobility", I failed to discover if "mobility" was limited to "upward mobility" or whether "mobility" goes both ways.

I'd also like to suggest that by some other measures, America isn't such a bad place to live. Our per-capita income is one of the highest in the world (If not the highest, noting the comments on Luxembourg and Bermuda in the link below).

Word Per Capita Incomes.

52 posted on 08/18/2005 10:20:45 AM PDT by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: facedown
And now, back to discussion of the topic. One factor that I'm interested in is the impact of immigration on the situation in the U.S. and Britain, where it's comparatively easy to come in and start a business. Does competition from these immigrants make it harder for the "underclasses" to move up?

Another question - when I quickly read the report on "Intergenerational mobility", I failed to discover if "mobility" was limited to "upward mobility" or whether "mobility" goes both ways.

I'd also like to suggest that by some other measures, America isn't such a bad place to live. Our per-capita income is one of the highest in the world (If not the highest, noting the comments on Luxembourg and Bermuda in the link below).

Word Per Capita Incomes.

53 posted on 08/18/2005 10:20:45 AM PDT by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Doctor
and yodelheads like you aren't smart enough to understand

Include me in the yodelhead category...

But you belong in this category there, Doctor Doctor...


54 posted on 08/18/2005 10:21:24 AM PDT by SolidRedState (E Pluribus Funk --- (Latin taglines are sooooo cool! Don't ya think?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Doctor
To Paraphrase the Thompson Twins:

"Doctor, Doctor. Can't you see I'm zotted, zotted."

55 posted on 08/18/2005 10:21:39 AM PDT by Clemenza (Pirro is Hillary with an (R))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Really?!?! I sorta like this one...

Now that's one happy cat!

56 posted on 08/18/2005 10:21:48 AM PDT by RedBeaconNY (Vous parlez trop, mais vous ne dites rien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RedBeaconNY

Nobody should be allowed to do that to a cat!


57 posted on 08/18/2005 10:23:03 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Officially around the bend, at least for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Doctor
You need to look at better research - this is based only on MALE earnings. Since much mobility in this country (and others') is based on two-income families, this research cannot tell us much beyond what the boys are doing.

Try this research instead: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/BG1418.cfm

Many academic studies have found remarkably consistent results that suggest there is substantial income mobility in the United States. 1 For example:

* A 1992 Treasury Department study showed that between 1979 and 1988, 86 percent of those in the bottom income quintile moved to a higher quintile, and 35 percent in the top income quintile moved to a lower quintile. 2

* A 1995 Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas report showed that almost three-fourths of those in the bottom quintile in 1975 were in a higher quintile by 1991, and almost 40 percent in the top quintile moved down to a lower quintile over the same period. 3

* A 1996 Urban Institute study showed that large numbers of Americans move into a new income quintile, with estimates ranging from 25 percent to 40 percent in a single year. The same study found even higher mobility rates over longer periods: about 45 percent over five years and 60 percent over 9-year and 17-year periods. 4

* In 1998, the Census Bureau reported that, on average, over 41 percent of Americans increased their inflation-adjusted income by 5 percent or more per year from 1984 to 1994. 5 The primary reasons for changes in income from year to year were changes in marital status, changes in the number of workers in the household, and moving into or out of full-time, year-round employment. * A 2000 Economic Policy Institute study showed that almost 60 percent of Americans in the lowest income quintile in 1969 were in a higher quintile in 1996, and over 61 percent in the highest income quintile had moved down into a lower income quintile during the same period. 6

The direction of income mobility is also important. The upward movement of workers in the second-lowest and middle-income quintiles is larger than the downward movement. From 1969 to 1994, the income of 53 percent of workers in the second-lowest income quintile had increased enough to move them up into a higher income quintile, and 38.7 percent of workers in the middle quintile had moved up compared to 37.9 who moved down. 7

Additionally, the unemployment rates in the US and UK are far less than the unemployment rates in most of the other countries mentioned in the research.

And BTW, posters here at FR prefer logic, data to back up your assertions, and sarcasm; not personal attacks.

58 posted on 08/18/2005 10:24:34 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lOKKI

Another thing to ponder:

I lived in Norway for a year, a number of years ago. Buying a cotton, button-down, long-sleved shirt cost me $48 at the time. At the same time in the US, it would only have cost me $18. Even when people make less money in this country, we are still better off because our money goes further - fewer taxes.


59 posted on 08/18/2005 10:27:34 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Hehehe... there's a really funny story behind it posted on Ebaumsworld.com... but I'm having a hard time finding it. In the meantime, how about this kind fellow?

(Look closely)

60 posted on 08/18/2005 10:32:59 AM PDT by RedBeaconNY (Vous parlez trop, mais vous ne dites rien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson