You can see where this could go.
1 posted on
08/18/2005 7:07:28 AM PDT by
radar101
To: radar101
2 posted on
08/18/2005 7:12:15 AM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: radar101
I'd be very wary of endorsing this kind of tactic.
3 posted on
08/18/2005 7:12:56 AM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: radar101; Know your rights; freepatriot32
You can see where this could go. Same place its already gone for thousands of Americans under asset forfeiture. The more the merrier.
8 posted on
08/18/2005 7:19:25 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: radar101
this has been in use nationwide for years - only now it catches someone with some political power and money and all of a sudden it becomes a dangerous tactic?
It always was unconstitutional! Just because this jerk is a politician (lawyer too?) doesn't give him special priveledges. If anything people in power should be punished much more severely for breaking laws.
Back to the seizure and confiscation of property .... IF a court can convince a jury that property was paid for by illegal gains, then the property can be forfeit TO REPAY THOSE IT WAS STOLEN FROM! Only after a trial by jury.
This crap of small city-state gestapos stopping people on the freeway, confiscating cars, money, etc (NO drugs or anything illegal) and then telling the people to leave --- they need to be lined up against the wall as common highway robbers - and the politicinas, lawyers and judges who are ruling over the gestapo also!
To: radar101
Cunningham's troubles started with another home sale in 2003. He sold his Del Mar-area home to defense contractor Mitchell Wade for $1.675 million. Wade, who put it back on the market shortly after he bought it, sold it at a $700,000 loss.
Pretty Good scam except they got greedy. Income non taxable to house seller and loss deductible to business.
As usual the article states this is a republican. I don't mind that, I hold republicans to a higher standard.
10 posted on
08/18/2005 7:20:27 AM PDT by
PeterPrinciple
(Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: radar101
No conviction should mean no lien and no punishment. If they get a conviction, they can go after the assets he has at the time of the conviction.
13 posted on
08/18/2005 7:29:13 AM PDT by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: freepatriot32
25 posted on
08/18/2005 9:31:11 AM PDT by
FOG724
(RINOS - they are not better than leftists, they ARE leftists.)
To: radar101
Property rights are for large corporations.
27 posted on
08/18/2005 9:43:23 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
28 posted on
08/18/2005 12:32:15 PM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: abbi_normal_2; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; AMDG&BVMH; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.List of Ping lists
29 posted on
08/18/2005 12:33:24 PM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: radar101
He better sell it quick, the market is tanking down in SD
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson