The capital cost of wind farms is smaller than nuclear, the footprint is smaller than nuclear, there is no fuel or waste, power prices for wind farms are recently being negotiated on fixed price & term basis (no fuel escalation), and the returns are general about 20% afer-tax in the tenth year of operation (when all the production tax credits are taken into consideration).
The drawback is of course that wind energy is intermittent. But then, no one (reasonable) is really suggesting they be a baseload power source. More wind AND nuclear is the way to go.
Thank you.
Tell me, what do you think of the combination nuclear/desalination/electrical generating plants?