Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Potter and the realm of big government
NH Union Leader ^ | 8/17/05 | FERGUS CULLEN

Posted on 08/17/2005 1:10:26 PM PDT by T-Bird45

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Lizavetta

I imagine she is using her money to avoid paying taxes


41 posted on 08/17/2005 6:16:27 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

They can still use spells silently. That just means that it can't be defended against as well. If you speak it then it will be blocked. If they don't know what you're doing they can't block it. It is NOT disarming like the Nazis.

And for your info. a lot of those ministries are necessary. Underage magic could be dangerous. The animals are VERY dangerous. The sports games gather attention. Throughout the whole wizarding world they have to make sure no muggles find out about them.


42 posted on 08/17/2005 7:37:06 PM PDT by onja ("The government of England is a limited mockery." (France is a complete mockery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

Let's not forget about Hermione's attempts to unionize the House Elves.


43 posted on 08/17/2005 7:53:18 PM PDT by pooh fan ("Strong, the pull of the Dark Side is". Yoda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

Let's not forget about Hermione's attempts to unionize the House Elves.


44 posted on 08/17/2005 8:00:02 PM PDT by pooh fan ("Strong, the pull of the Dark Side is". Yoda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onja

I have to note that the 6th book is the first one to address silent spells, and it is clearly only a well-trained, advanced student that can pull it off, because it requires incredible effort to focus the spell without the verbal componant. Although we have seen low level spells go off quietly and/or with a mere wave of the hand (Snape closing curtains, that kind of thing) the students weren't taught until their sixth year HOW to do it...and it was in the all important 5th year that the Ministry started spoon feeding them the milk of theory over the meat of actual practice.


45 posted on 08/17/2005 8:05:29 PM PDT by 50sDad (Star Trek Tri-D Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: discostu; MadIvan
people driving around with special antenaes looking for people watching TV who haven't paid the TV tax.

what???

46 posted on 08/17/2005 10:55:09 PM PDT by King Prout (and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
people driving around with special antenaes looking for people watching TV who haven't paid the TV tax.

what???


Sounds like a Swedish pastime.
47 posted on 08/18/2005 3:41:00 AM PDT by schwing_wifey (Coffee, Today's Toons, and Flaming Trolls - Yeeeaaaarrrgggggg PDT +9hours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

:-)


48 posted on 08/18/2005 4:07:18 AM PDT by saveliberty (If all of the economists were to lie down head to toe, they would never reach a conclusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

In Britain and much of Europe, you pay a TV tax to support the government broadcast system. They can determine if you have a TV in your home by checking for the local oscillator frequency that is given off by the TV, hence the "antenna van" prowling neighborhoods.

When I was in the US Army in W.Germany, a friend of mine, a civilian Army employee that lived on the German economy, was hit up by the Bundespost for the tax. He had to prove he was an American government employee that was not subject to the tax.


49 posted on 08/18/2005 4:39:52 AM PDT by T-Bird45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Well, she HAS paid over $700,000,000 in taxes ---- I am absolutely serious about that number. (70% on a billion dollars of income).

I suppose that gives her more standing than most to say where her money is spent.

That said, if what you say is true, I would disagree with her.


50 posted on 08/18/2005 7:26:11 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

She has complained about taxes --- as most of her money is clearly-traceable INCOME and thus nailed by the brits.

Serious estimates are north of $700 million paid in taxes.


51 posted on 08/18/2005 7:27:17 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

There is a "TV" tax in england. You pay for each set.

They drive around with sensors to see if you are cheating.


52 posted on 08/18/2005 7:29:06 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
There are some mis-statements in the article, but on the whole it's pretty funny. What the author seems to miss, however, is how much Rowling seems to be ridiculing such large government most of the time. The Ministry is very inefficient, highly politicized, and especially in the 5th installment, worse than counter-productive, it's actually an enemy to Harry.

The two major factual errors in the article:


53 posted on 08/18/2005 7:37:26 AM PDT by kevkrom (WARNING: If you're not sure whether or not it's sarcasm, it probably is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson