Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PLMerite
I'll get behind that if the laws are written in such a way that no druggie ever (*ever*) costs me a dime. No welfare, no "treatment," no "education." Period.

So you must also support banning alcohol until such time as no alkie ever (*ever*) costs you a dime. Right?

66 posted on 08/17/2005 1:21:19 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Know your rights

I wish nobody cost me a dime. I wish the government would get out of the wealth redistribution business altogether. I'll donate to charities that I think help the sort of people I wish to help, and I'd ask others to do the same. But as it is now, I pay at government gunpoint for a whole lot of people, organizations, and business concerns that I don't wish to, including the helthcare and incarceration costs of druggies, as well as salaries, toys, and pensions of drug warriors. I particularly dislike paying for those.


71 posted on 08/17/2005 1:33:00 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Know your rights

"So you must also support banning alcohol until such time as no alkie ever (*ever*) costs you a dime. Right?"

Yup. Why do you ask, do you think it's your "right" to get stoned on my dime?


276 posted on 08/17/2005 6:14:51 PM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson