Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spycatcher

Obscure name "Mohammad Atta"?

How is it obscure....

Mohammad you don't even have to try to remember, its unbeliveably common (due to the arabic practice of giving the first name of somoene you greatly admire).

And Atta... its 4 letters, 2 of which are repeated. If I saw that name is sure as well would be easy to remember.

Why is Jpod the clown seemingly working so hard to discredit this every day?

I fart in his general direction...


5 posted on 08/17/2005 8:56:22 AM PDT by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Sheiite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomNeocon
Mark Steyn backs you up:

WHAT'S IN A NAME? [Mark Steyn] I'd like to second Andy's point re Mohammed Atta's name. He's the only one of the 9/11 hijackers I can mention in a column without checking first. Call me a schmuck, but even now I find the rest of the batting order confusing: be honest, can you tell your Ahmed al-Ghamdi from your Ahmed al-Nami or your Ahmed al-Haznawi or your Ahmed al-Gore? (For the benefit of the 9/11 Commission, one of these was not a 9/11 hijacker.) How about your Waleed al-Shehri from your Wail al-Shehri? You can't tell the players with a score card.

On any list of Arab suspects, Mohammed Atta's stands out because it's closest to a Western form. Two names, no intervening al or bin. The surname could be Italian - like Tony Danza, who like Mr Atta is also believed to have spent time in Brooklyn. I think it's highly likely that, if you were going to remember any name on a terrorist watch list, it would be this one.

If JPod is going to question memory, the more interesting question is why, until they were handed their cue cards, Lee Hamilton and the other Commissioners apparently had no memory of this "Able Danger" unit or its work. Unlike Andy, I'm no expert in this field, but simply because I don't want to sound like a chump in interviews I'm pretty much on top of the Mohammed Atta timeline, its contradictions and its gaps. Isn't that the least Americans are entitled to expect from the grandees in whose name the "definitive" "non-partisan" report on 9/11 is issued? The sense you get from the Commissioners' statements last week is that they left way too much of this stuff to anonymous staffers to fillet. Maybe they should have spent less time in make-up for CNN. Posted at 12:00 PM

25 posted on 08/17/2005 9:18:17 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson