To: betty boop
It is a disgrace to politicize science like this.
Indeed. And it is illegal to discriminate against an employee based on his (presumed) beliefs. It is also an abuse of power for people on the public dole, to use their power for an illegal purpose. IMHO, this case will end up in civil court where the Smithsonian cannot refuse to cooperate in discovery. In that regard it is akin to the potential lawsuit in Ohio - and the successful challenge which avoided a lawsuit in Texas.
The scientists and administrators who seek to defend the theory of evolution may have to learn the hard way - how not to cross the line of what is legal and what is not.
To: Alamo-Girl
Indeed. And it is illegal to discriminate against an employee based on his (presumed) beliefs.Sternberg is not an employee of the Smithsonian. He's an employee of NCBI.
15 posted on
08/17/2005 7:59:41 AM PDT by
Right Wing Professor
(ID: the 'scientific hypothesis' that somebody did something to some gene or other sometime somehow.)
To: Alamo-Girl; PatrickHenry
And it is illegal to discriminate against an employee based on his (presumed) beliefs. Indeed, as when some one notes that "Mr. Sternberg had 'extensive training as an orthodox priest'...." As if this somehow makes him unfit as a scientist -- with two doctorates in evolutionary biology no less.
This entire episode is sick-making, disgusting. I hope Mr. Sternberg gets his day in court.
16 posted on
08/17/2005 8:00:53 AM PDT by
betty boop
(Nature loves to hide. -- Heraclitus)
To: Alamo-Girl
19 posted on
08/17/2005 8:09:46 AM PDT by
js1138
(Science has it all: the fun of being still, paying attention, writing down numbers...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson