Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

Then there's that tape of Clinton speaking in Long Island, early 2002, and describing how he had the offer from Sudan, that they would turn over Bin Laden in that same time period in 1996, but Clinton thought only the Saudis should take on that hot potato, the Saudis refused, and Clinton allowed Bin Laden to slip out of our reach into Afghanistan.....[the 9/11 Commission was informed of this tape but in their report they assert that no such offer from the Sudanes was ever made]..... then Clinton spent the next 4 years fecklessly saying he would like to do something about terrorism but never actually doing much at all.... every plan and every opportunity to nail Bin Laden was passed up.


22 posted on 08/16/2005 8:38:52 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Enchante
With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...

banner
banner
banner
banner
banner
banner
banner
banner
banner
banner

Monday, Sept. 13, 2004 3:39 p.m. EDT

Flashback: Rather Nixed Tape of Clinton on bin Laden

Last week wasn't the first time one-time journalist Dan Rather tried to foist bogus evidence on his "60 Minutes" audience in a bid to boost his favorite Democrat.

Just three months ago, Rather allowed ex-President Bill Clinton to get away with claiming he had no knowledge of a 1996 offer from Sudan to have Osama bin Laden arrested – even after his producers had been warned that Clinton was on tape admitting the offer was real.

Story Continues Below

Rather had been chosen by Clinton for the rollout interview of his presidential memoir, "My Life," so the former newsman wasn't too anxious to see his exclusive go south by pressing his guest on uncomfortable topics like the bin Laden blunder.

Rather introduced the topic in a voice-over:

"President Clinton says he was, quote, 'obsessed' with bin Laden during his time in office and denies he refused opportunities to capture the al-Qaida leader."

Then "60 Minutes" cut to Clinton:

"To the best of my knowledge, it is not true that we were ever offered him by the Sudanese, even though they later claimed it. I think it's total bull."

That's not what Mr. Clinton claimed two years earlier, comments to which Rather and his team were alerted three days before they allowed the ex-president to fib on "60 Minutes."

"We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again," the ex-president told a Long Island business group in February 2002.

"They released [bin Laden]. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

When offered a recording of Clinton contradicting the account he gave Rather before the interview was aired, a "60 Minutes" producer told NewsMax: Thanks, but no thanks. Instead, the once-respected newsman gave his audience information he had reason to believe was false.

Three weeks later, CNN's Christiane Amanpour had the courage to ask Clinton the question Rather would not.

AMANPOUR: Sometime in 1996, or - you spoke to a group of people in Long Island about this whole controversial issue of Sudan.

CLINTON: Actually, it was 2001. [In fact, it was 2002.]

AMANPOUR: OK. Was Sudan asked to extradite him? Did you miss the opportunity to have him extradited?

CLINTON: And I mis - what I said there was wrong. What I said was in error. I went back now and did all this research from my book. And I'd said that we were told we couldn't hold him, implying that we had a chance to get him, but we didn't. That's not factually accurate. [End of Excerpt]

No wonder Dan Rather didn't want to ask.

To hear the recording Dan Rather pretended not to know about, Click Here.

Editor's note:

To hear the actual tape, go to HERE and scroll to the bottom and punch CLICK HERE.

37 posted on 08/16/2005 8:47:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

The kedia can't get the simple Able Danger story out to the public....they are NEVER going to go indepth with this one!


41 posted on 08/16/2005 8:47:44 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
Image hosted by Photobucket.com yeah... and that tape is PROOF of his Purjury in front of the 9/11 commission!!!

But Clinton administration diplomats have adamantly denied that they received such an offer, and the Sept. 11 commission concluded in one of its staff reports that it had "not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim." that SlickWillie said he never got!!!

105 posted on 08/16/2005 9:26:27 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
Then there's that tape of Clinton speaking in Long Island, early 2002, and describing how he had the offer from Sudan, that they would turn over Bin Laden in that same time period in 1996,

Thanks. I was looking for that reference.

111 posted on 08/16/2005 9:34:06 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

I remember hearing that tape on WABC radio on a Sean Hannity program...of course, the MSM ignired it.


242 posted on 08/17/2005 9:09:55 PM PDT by foreshadowed at waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson