Then there's that tape of Clinton speaking in Long Island, early 2002, and describing how he had the offer from Sudan, that they would turn over Bin Laden in that same time period in 1996, but Clinton thought only the Saudis should take on that hot potato, the Saudis refused, and Clinton allowed Bin Laden to slip out of our reach into Afghanistan.....[the 9/11 Commission was informed of this tape but in their report they assert that no such offer from the Sudanes was ever made]..... then Clinton spent the next 4 years fecklessly saying he would like to do something about terrorism but never actually doing much at all.... every plan and every opportunity to nail Bin Laden was passed up.
With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff |
For the story behind the story... |
![]() |
![]() |
Monday, Sept. 13, 2004 3:39 p.m. EDT Flashback: Rather Nixed Tape of Clinton on bin Laden Last week wasn't the first time one-time journalist Dan Rather tried to foist bogus evidence on his "60 Minutes" audience in a bid to boost his favorite Democrat. Story Continues Below
Rather introduced the topic in a voice-over: "President Clinton says he was, quote, 'obsessed' with bin Laden during his time in office and denies he refused opportunities to capture the al-Qaida leader." Then "60 Minutes" cut to Clinton: "To the best of my knowledge, it is not true that we were ever offered him by the Sudanese, even though they later claimed it. I think it's total bull." That's not what Mr. Clinton claimed two years earlier, comments to which Rather and his team were alerted three days before they allowed the ex-president to fib on "60 Minutes." "We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again," the ex-president told a Long Island business group in February 2002. "They released [bin Laden]. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."
When offered a recording of Clinton contradicting the account he gave Rather before the interview was aired, a "60 Minutes" producer told NewsMax: Thanks, but no thanks. Instead, the once-respected newsman gave his audience information he had reason to believe was false.
Three weeks later, CNN's Christiane Amanpour had the courage to ask Clinton the question Rather would not.
AMANPOUR: Sometime in 1996, or - you spoke to a group of people in Long Island about this whole controversial issue of Sudan. CLINTON: Actually, it was 2001. [In fact, it was 2002.] AMANPOUR: OK. Was Sudan asked to extradite him? Did you miss the opportunity to have him extradited? CLINTON: And I mis - what I said there was wrong. What I said was in error. I went back now and did all this research from my book. And I'd said that we were told we couldn't hold him, implying that we had a chance to get him, but we didn't. That's not factually accurate. [End of Excerpt] No wonder Dan Rather didn't want to ask. To hear the recording Dan Rather pretended not to know about, Click Here. Editor's note: |
To hear the actual tape, go to HERE and scroll to the bottom and punch CLICK HERE.
The kedia can't get the simple Able Danger story out to the public....they are NEVER going to go indepth with this one!
But Clinton administration diplomats have adamantly denied that they received such an offer, and the Sept. 11 commission concluded in one of its staff reports that it had "not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim." that SlickWillie said he never got!!!
Thanks. I was looking for that reference.
I remember hearing that tape on WABC radio on a Sean Hannity program...of course, the MSM ignired it.