My distrust of the Times is very deep. I cannot believe that this is straight, impartial reporting.
Possibilities for the underlying meaning to this story:
1. They are trying to set up Zekilow as the fall guy.
2. They are trying to get Condi; a later story will accuse her of ignoring a briefing.
3. There is something worse in these documents that is being hidden by printing this story as a diversion.
4. They are trying to go the "old news" route on behalf of Hillary.
I DO NOT TRUST THE NEW YORK TIMES. And what about Judith Miller, who is still in jail? Who was her source? I notice she has disappeared from the spotlight.
And WHY would Judicial Watch turn these documents over to the Times? Why would they think the Times can be trusted? Why not turn them over to the Washington Times, or the Wall Street Journal? I find this entire story and its source very weird.
Well, just consider, if Judicial Watch had turned the document over, only to the Washington Times, or FOXNews, or Rush, the MSM would have ignored it. They can't very well ignore The Mother Ship NYT.
But believe me, I'm not discounting your well-founded suspicions.