Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: YaYa123
I would like to know why Judicial Watch turned these documents over to the New York Times, myself. Is this the ONLY information in the documents, or is there something more damning that we haven't been told?

My distrust of the Times is very deep. I cannot believe that this is straight, impartial reporting.

Possibilities for the underlying meaning to this story:

1. They are trying to set up Zekilow as the fall guy.

2. They are trying to get Condi; a later story will accuse her of ignoring a briefing.

3. There is something worse in these documents that is being hidden by printing this story as a diversion.

4. They are trying to go the "old news" route on behalf of Hillary.

I DO NOT TRUST THE NEW YORK TIMES. And what about Judith Miller, who is still in jail? Who was her source? I notice she has disappeared from the spotlight.

And WHY would Judicial Watch turn these documents over to the Times? Why would they think the Times can be trusted? Why not turn them over to the Washington Times, or the Wall Street Journal? I find this entire story and its source very weird.

167 posted on 08/17/2005 4:07:41 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Karl Rove is Plame-proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
"And WHY would Judicial Watch turn these documents over to the Times"

Well, just consider, if Judicial Watch had turned the document over, only to the Washington Times, or FOXNews, or Rush, the MSM would have ignored it. They can't very well ignore The Mother Ship NYT.

But believe me, I'm not discounting your well-founded suspicions.

168 posted on 08/17/2005 4:19:52 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson