Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
Wow! I have a seriously flawed concept of the SETI program. My comments above related to it should be totally disregarded. Time to go do some reading!

However, your arguments do carry merit. Terrestrial interference is becoming a huge problem. This is why a telescope array with dishes having more than 1000 miles of separation can overcome that issue.

Thanks for the correction RA. It's obvious I learned nothing during the brief period I loaned them my computer back in 1999. Sad to think I was one of their first participants.

You are being too hard on yourself. There are real probs with SETI, I have described a few of them. :-)

While I'm at it I think I'll rejoin the quest!

It's definitely a long shot. I wont kid you there. :-)

142 posted on 08/17/2005 6:44:31 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer

Here's a question I've wondered about on occasion: would an array on the dark side of the moon be shielded from terrestrial interference or would the 'ambience' still be so great that it wouldn't make much difference? In other words, if SETI were set up on the moon, could it search the entire spectrum, or at least much more of it?


155 posted on 08/17/2005 9:23:02 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson