To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...
If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail not by posting to this thread.
2 posted on
08/16/2005 3:47:04 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...
If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail not by posting to this thread.
3 posted on
08/16/2005 3:47:43 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: Paleo Conservative
Again I state that it took all of Europe with their heavy Government funding to do what one US company does on its own...build large aircraft that are still the world standard.
5 posted on
08/16/2005 3:58:40 PM PDT by
ICE-FLYER
(God bless and keep the United States of America)
To: Paleo Conservative
Airbus confirmed the delay of the delivery of its super-jumbo jet for no specific reason oink oink
6 posted on
08/16/2005 4:44:28 PM PDT by
hattend
(Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
To: Paleo Conservative
Airbus confirmed the delay of the delivery of its super-jumbo jet for no specific reason.We're Euroweenies, with our noses so far in the air we might drown in a rainstorm, don't you know. We don't have to give you plebes no friggin' reason for a delay! You are fortunate that we stoop to relieve you of your dinero/$/francs/what-have-you.
7 posted on
08/16/2005 5:43:24 PM PDT by
Babu
To: Paleo Conservative
Airbus confirmed the delay of the delivery of its super-jumbo jet for no specific reason. No specific reasons?
One wonders what could be so damning that they couldn't be "specific".
The overweight issue was well known. Any other possibilities?
Why would any airline order A380s until the truth finds it's way out of the hangar and they could feel assured that the aircraft will meet safety standards and performance claims?
Am I wrong, or is Boeing simply more straightforward about such things?
.
8 posted on
08/16/2005 9:10:42 PM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Paleo Conservative
Maybe it's cheaper to pay penalties for late deliveries than to pay penalties for substandard performance.
I assume the airlines got it in writing that the plane perform to its specifications. What do you do when it doesn't?
If your new plane is a gashog or a hangar queen, orders get cancelled, options evaporate and customers go to your competition. Better to delay delivery and try to fix problems than to put a shoddy product on the runway for all to see.
9 posted on
08/16/2005 10:26:42 PM PDT by
ZOOKER
( <== I'm with Stupid...)
To: Paleo Conservative
SIA might ask for over 6 million US dollars, said the reportDelta should order some A380s. They are nearing bankruptcy and could use the cash.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson