[KMJames]

If so, can you explain how one of the others being true would falsify the theory of evolution? If not, then how the first life forms came to exist is truly irrelevant to the theory of evolution.

Well, actually it seems that if any of the three candidates you posited as possible agents in originating life were "the originating force", then that force may have acted at other times.

It seems that it would be quite relevant to evolution, if it were subjected to such a force even once after the "origin".

[Dimensio]

Well, actually it seems that if any of the three candidates you posited as possible agents in originating life were "the originating force", then that force may have acted at other times.

There is no postulate in biology that abiognesis was only possible in the past and is not possible now.

It seems that it would be quite relevant to evolution, if it were subjected to such a force even once after the "origin".

How would it be relevant? Be specific.