If you bothered to read, you would have seen that the IDers could care less if their theory is taught in public school.
They want the growing evidence against Darwinism to be presented ... instead of supressed. Evidence for and against a theory should be presented ... any reasonable scientist would agree.
The major problem here is that there doesnt exist a reasonable Darwinist. They are the ones that are frothing at the mouth at the thought of their theory being criticized.
The history of creationist frauds is long (no doubt someone will be along to post another piece of disproven evidence shortly). It is only reasonable that 'evidence against Darwinism' go through peer review like all other scientific data.
Who are these 'Darwinists' you keep speaking of? You don't call physicists 'Newtonists' do you?
Growing so fast that not a single new idea or argument has been put forward since Paley's "Natural Theology" in 1802. But wait, that was before Darwin.
If you disagree, show me any idea that was not in Paley's book.
So there is no positive "theory" of ID (but we knew that already), only alleged "evidence" against "Darwinism".
So what is this evidence of which you speak?
BTTT