[GSHastings]

Because it's scope doesn't include the origin of life, and never has? How difficult is this for you to comprehend?

Pretty difficult, actually. I believe that the very first living thing was a species, bless it's little heart. Don't you kind of feel sorry for it, all alone out there with no explanation )-;

It doesn't explain quantum physics either. Is that a deficiency in the theory?

No. That would be an imaginary deficiency. There are enough real deficiencies to worry about. :-)

[Dimensio]

I believe that the very first living thing was a species, bless it's little heart. Don't you kind of feel sorry for it, all alone out there with no explanation )-;

Do you have an argument against evolution that isn't based purely in semantic games?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" Pretty difficult, actually. I believe that the very first living thing was a species, bless it's little heart."

And that would be abiogenesis, not evolution that would deal with that. Demanding that evolution explain the origin of life is willful ignorance.