Replies

"I like your very scientific analysis here. The illustration above is called an analogous syllogism, a literary technique of comparison to real world examples that people can relate to. I'm sorry that was lost on you, however, as a devout adherent to the secular fundamentalist religious belief of evolution, it doesn't surprise me that this analogy was lost on you."

It wasn't lost on me. Nobody has come up with any realistic probability concerning the creation of life from nonliving matter because there is no way to make such a calculation. Anybody who says they have such a calculation is pulling the number out of their ass. When I said *It has no relation whatsoever with any known physical process." I was talking about the alleged calculation showing evolution not possible.

"My favorite was the response to the article that HARVARD, that "conservative" and God-loving bastion of support for all things conservative (tongue in cheek of course), notes clearly that evolution includes the origination or "genesis" of life itself."

This is a lie. Only the MSM article alluded to this study supporting evolution. The Harvard scientists made no such claim. Because some journalist made an ignorant claim it is true? You really WILL believe anything.

"My favorite was the response to the article that HARVARD, that "conservative" and God-loving bastion of support for all things conservative (tongue in cheek of course), notes clearly that evolution includes the origination or "genesis" of life itself."

This is a lie. Only the MSM article alluded to this study supporting evolution. The Harvard scientists made no such claim. Because some journalist made an ignorant claim it is true? You really WILL believe anything.

Which is why Darwin title his book "Evolution - The Origin Of Species (except the first one of course)".

"My favorite was the response to the article that HARVARD, that "conservative" and God-loving bastion of support for all things conservative (tongue in cheek of course), notes clearly that evolution includes the origination or "genesis" of life itself."

This is a lie. Only the MSM article alluded to this study supporting evolution. The Harvard scientists made no such claim. Because some journalist made an ignorant claim it is true? You really WILL believe anything.

This is too funny. Unlike evolution, at least I'm relying on DOCUMENTED RESULTS rather than pure faith based supposition :-) Oh, and I might add from multiple sources too for validation :-)

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2005-08-14-harvard-evolution_x.htm?POE=TECISVA

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8959763/

And there are lots more references too :-) Problem is that the evolutionary fundies, the secular fundamentalists can not stand that even HARVARD recognizes how silly it is to try to dodge the origins of life.

Evolution is the opiate of the atheists...