Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DouglasKC
" Good article. I would like to see an evolutionist answer this."

Ok, it's crap. The *probabilities* were pulled out of the ass of the author. It has no relation whatsoever with any known physical process. It is desperate wishful thinking.
313 posted on 08/16/2005 5:43:04 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: CarolinaGuitarman
" Good article. I would like to see an evolutionist answer this."
Ok, it's crap. The *probabilities* were pulled out of the ass of the author. It has no relation whatsoever with any known physical process. It is desperate wishful thinking.

Thanks for the well thought out answer. What are the probabilities of the card scenario occurring compared to the probability of dead matter becoming alive?

314 posted on 08/16/2005 5:46:58 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Ok, it's crap. The *probabilities* were pulled out of the ass of the author. It has no relation whatsoever with any known physical process. It is desperate wishful thinking.

Well, that's about the same level as the original post. Maybe he'll understand that. (not holding breath)

318 posted on 08/16/2005 5:50:20 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

Think of it like this, evolution believe that if you have a deck of 52 cards and two jokers, and then shuffle the deck thoroughly, and throw the entire deck up in the air as high as you can, that eventually all of the cards will land, in perfect order, and perfectly aligned. The probability of this even happening one time in a billion years approaches zero. Then, to believe evolutionary "theory," you have to accept on blind faith that this same miracle of perfect order from total chaos has repeated itself millions of times to account for each of the plants, animals, and life on earth.




" Good article. I would like to see an evolutionist answer this."

Ok, it's crap. The *probabilities* were pulled out of the ass of the author. It has no relation whatsoever with any known physical process. It is desperate wishful thinking.




I like your very scientific analysis here. The illustration above is called an analogous syllogism, a literary technique of comparison to real world examples that people can relate to. I'm sorry that was lost on you, however, as a devout adherent to the secular fundamentalist religious belief of evolution, it doesn't surprise me that this analogy was lost on you.

However, I am quite pleased that the wondeful evolutionists that have participated in this discussion have clearly demonstrated just how fervently zealous they are over their secular fundamental religious beliefs.

The ad hoc attacks rather than addressing the underlying criticisms of evolution show nothing but just how much of a zealous fundamentalist movement evolution truly is.

My favorite was the response to the article that HARVARD, that "conservative" and God-loving bastion of support for all things conservative (tongue in cheek of course), notes clearly that evolution includes the origination or "genesis" of life itself. So much so that it is dedicating initially a million dollars to its study.

How interesting that the evolution fundies simply attack even the source of the article, another "conservative" bastion of God-loving reporters at the USA Today...

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2005-08-14-harvard-evolution_x.htm?POE=TECISVA

ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com


402 posted on 08/16/2005 7:57:48 PM PDT by woodb01 (ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson