--> The Cult of Evolution – the Opiate of the Atheists

NoDNC.com - STOP Democrat Corruption ^ | NoDNC.com Staff

[GSHastings]

Why not just admit that you don't have a valid argument rather than using such transparant lies?

Because I know that eventually my transparent lies will evolve opaqueness, and people will believe them.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

...which I think really defines the level of intelligence and courtesy of the creationist side of this discussion, so I commented on it.

I am not a creationist, your comment was superfluous and inane. Think, or at least, read a little before you make assumptions. Of course, being nothing more than an anti-creationist does not lend credibility to your argument or to the religious fervor of evolutionists.

What I don't like and think is counter productive is the bigotry against the Judaic religious folks, for which they are not deserved. (Yes, Christianity is a Judaic religion; as opposed to Islam, which is pagan).

Unless you are a Democrat or a Marxist lurking here, why would a Republican or anyone on the right want to alienate the religious folks? They are the primary reason we don't have Algore or Skeery Queery in the Whitehouse - - unless that is what you wanted all along.

Just because somebody is an atheist does not mean I will refrain from challenging them. There is no such thing as an ecumenical atheist. So unless you are just looking for a pissing contest like that jerk-off Marxist, I welcome the discussion. Otherwise, you know the drill, lieutenant...

[CarolinaGuitarman]

Forgot to ping you to post #680, since I mentioned you.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"So unless you are just looking for a pissing contest like that jerk-off Marxist"

Still scared to ping me. Cause I see through your bully-wanna-be crap. And I laugh at you :)

[Doctor Stochastic]

Notice that no creationist nor ID supporter criticizes this type of behavior. The endorsement by silence continues.

[js1138]

Someone really wants to get this thread pulled. I'm happy to see that no one is taking the bait.

[SQUID]

Evolution is not science

[js1138]

I am saving the obscene posts for the inevitable time when this thread is pulled.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Someone really wants to get this thread pulled. I'm happy to see that no one is taking the bait."

What does one say to arguments like *You're a homo! You're a Marxist. F*** you!" How can one show the inability of the opposition to come up with an intelligent argument better than that? It's still better than when he hoped I would put a shotgun to my head and blow my brains out on a different thread. lol Classic bully; all bluster and no backbone.

[js1138]

Don't make assumptions about motives. Over the years this kind of thing has been bait to get someone to push the abuse button. It doesn't matter which side does it. The result is always the same. A thread that is intensely embarrassing to the creationists is pulled, and all their obscenity is erased from view.

[muir_redwoods]

"Lord have mercy...I think I've had quite enough of this."

Yes, when you can't make a coherent point and have to stoop to a bogus accusation of racism, yes, I'd say you've had enough. It's been fun.

[Gumlegs]

Oh, sure, talk big about other stuff, but when it comes for a response to the logic in post 687 where are you?

[Dimensio]

If someone can get their Fischer Chemistry set out and whip up just one combination that results in life, then they will have proven...well...uh....I guess that they will have proven that it is possible for Intelligence to create life.

So intelligent design is non-falsifiable then?

Until someone figures out how life is made, no one has any basis what-so-ever in presuming that it is likely, let alone possible, for it to have occured by chance.

So life can't exist then?

[Doctor Stochastic]

Naturally. We used to see this from certain Other-DU posters.

However, my comment still stands. The creationists support this behavior.

[js1138]

The creationists support this behavior.

Of course they do. When I pointed out the obscene comments to Dataman, he simply quit responding. Actually he did post to me, but it appeared to have been accidental. He started witha quote from someone else.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Oh, sure, talk big about other stuff, but when it comes for a response to the logic in post 687 where are you?"

What was I thinking? Four words that Darwin won't answer! (Why? What was he afraid of?!?! So what if he is dead! Typical evolutionist just-so logic!) I yield to the logic of, "Evolution is not science". There is no way to counter that.

[Gumlegs]

Thphth.

[va4me]

FYI:

http://www.theshrubbery.com/udn/

[GSHastings]

So intelligent design is non-falsifiable then?

Although intelligent design is often very hard to detect, especially with computer software, it obviously is possible to prove that intelligent design exists, abundantly.

Whether or not it is "falsifiable"...you tell me? If you can't think of a way to falsify it, will you stop believing in intelligent design?

[GSHastings]

Until someone figures out how life is made, no one has any basis what-so-ever in presuming that it is likely, let alone possible, for it to have occured by chance.

"So life can't exist then?"

Not according to the voices in my head.