I really don't think so. Just step back and look at what we have.
We have Weldon.
That's it. Just his word. No documentation. No names. Nothing at all to corroborate his statements. That's just not enough particularly when you can be certain that there is at least one and probably several Able Danger files in existence that document all of their findings. All he has to do is read those documents himself and, in an unclassified way, tell us what they said.
Don't get me wrong. I hope Weldon's story holds water. If the evidence is there and available to the blogosphere we can have another Rather-like victory. But at this point that looks unlikely. Maybe in a week things will be looking up. I hope so.
No, we have more than Weldon. Other papers have independently quoted military sources. ]
Now could military guys be lying to sell future books?
Theoretically, but it would be shocking if it was a military greed conspiracy.