To: RnMomof7
The people of Iraq were better off with Saddam than they will be under this "new democracy". Rubbish.
And just so you'll know -- and I'll know that you know -- the reason Bush 41 didn't "go on to Baghdad" is because he didn't have a UN mandate to do that.
You unappeasables should at least try to work in a FEW facts into your diatribes.
42 posted on
08/16/2005 8:05:01 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: Howlin
And just so you'll know -- and I'll know that you know -- the reason Bush 41 didn't "go on to Baghdad" is because he didn't have a UN mandate to do that.Yea . Are you saying a republican president was a slave to the UN? He could have had Saddam "eliminated" in a clean hit had he chosen.
Remember that up until that time Iraq was considered an ally
76 posted on
08/16/2005 8:30:10 AM PDT by
RnMomof7
(Sola Scriptura,Sola Christus,Sola Gratia,Sola Fide,Soli Deo Gloria)
To: Howlin
And just so you'll know -- and I'll know that you know -- the reason Bush 41 didn't "go on to Baghdad" is because he didn't have a UN mandate to do that. You unappeasables should at least try to work in a FEW facts into your diatribes.
Nice post, Howlin. Facts can be a real b***h when they blow your premise to smithereens. You are absolutely correct: the UN mandate was to kick Saddam out of Kuwait, and that mission was accomplished.
200 posted on
08/16/2005 10:31:46 AM PDT by
Night Hides Not
(The only NOC list containing the name of Valerie Plame was stolen by Ethan Hunt.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson