[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

The indisputable proof it’s about oil?

If it’s for the oil, Bush will find every excuse not to replace our troops and save their lives, and continue to hurt the Iraqi people by keeping our troops there.

If Bush’s real concern is for the safety of our troops and the welfare of the Iraqi people, he will give up the oil and replace our troops immediately.

It’s as simple as that.

Translation: "If you don't agree with peaceful, gentle, life-affirming kung fu super-hippie me: YOU MUST BE IN IT FOR THE FILTHY, STINKING OIL, YOU HORNED, SOULLESS JEW PAWNS OF HALIBURTON, YOU!!!"

In other words: Oy. :)

[kb2614]

YOU MUST BE IN IT FOR THE FILTHY, STINKING OIL, YOU HORNED, SOULLESS JEW PAWNS OF HALIBURTON, YOU!!!"

You make that sound like it's bad or something! I proudly carry my BushCheneyHalliburtonMilitaryIndustrialZionistOligarchalImperialistHegemonCabal membership card everywhere I go. Though it's hard to read since it's written in invisible ink. ;-)

[Fledermaus]

Yeah, that's why oil is $67 a barrel. I would think that if it was a war for oil it would get cheaper as we just "took it".

Besides, if we were going to "go to war for oil" then it would be really STUPID to go 6,000 miles to a desert and do it there when all we have to do is invade Canada, Mexico and Venezuala.

Danger would be less and our troops could come home every month for an extended weekend.

It never ceases to amaze me how true idiots can banter about the world of ideas and not once use simple logic.