[Junior]

First off, they were not all Ph.D.s Secondly, the question they were asked and the one that appeared above their names were subtley, but specifically different. It was a classic "bait-and-switch." Creationists are renowned for such underhanded tactics, which begs the question: if their position is so good, why do they have to resort to subterfuge.

[microgood]

First off, they were not all Ph.D.s

Here was the quote from the article(I guess PHD level is somewhat different?)

Recently, 400 Ph.D.-level scientists, including a distinguished embryologist and member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, signed a statement questioning the creative power of the natural selection/mutation mechanism.

Secondly, the question they were asked and the one that appeared above their names were subtley, but specifically different.

What were they actually asked?

[b_sharp]

How many Ph.D.s have not signed that little statement?