The issue is not objecting to ID or not.
Has nothing to do with it whether or not ID is true or untrue or evoluton is true or untrue.
This is a social political religious controversy with nada to do with science.
It has to do with the future of science.
The Kansas school board is in the process of changing their definition of "science" to include ID. A handful of elected religious ideologues cramming their viewpoint down an academic community.
If that doesn't involve the scientific community, then I don't know what does.
That may be your opinion; I, however, disagree. ID is not science, and should not be taught in science classes.