[ml1954]

The fact that you can't make your mind up about it is not surprising...

I think you missed my point. Let me be more explicit.

Osama would agree with this statement..."History, archeology, Scripture, fulfilled prophecy, documented historical eye-witness account and etc....all side with the claims of Islam".

But he would disagree with this statement..."History, archeology, Scripture, fulfilled prophecy, documented historical eye-witness account and etc....all side with the claims of Christianity".

Which statement is correct? And why? And which should everyone agree with? What experiments can we perform that might produce results that might support or disprove either statement?

[pby]

You missed the point (did we all miss the point?)...narby stated that the evidence of science would not lead to a conclusion that Jesus was Deity. I don't agree...I believe that the evidence would and does.

In a comparitive analysis related to evidence...the muslim holy book does not hold a candle to the Bible...God's Word wins hands down.

Start with this expirement...Look under every rock and in every corner of the solar system (and beyond). When you are finished and did not find God, or direct evidence thereof, then we can start to debate His existence.

[pby]

You missed the point (did we all miss the point?)...narby stated that the evidence of science would not lead to a conclusion that Jesus was Deity. I don't agree...I believe that the evidence would and does.

In a comparitive analysis related to evidence...the muslim holy book does not hold a candle to the Bible...God's Word wins hands down.

Start with this expirement...Look under every rock and in every corner of the solar system (and beyond). When you are finished and did not find God, or direct evidence thereof, then we can start to debate His existence.