Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBeers
On the other had ID suggests that the mathematical probabilities required to support the 'random' theory are impossible...

There are too many uncertainties about exactly how biology works for mathematics to be useful in discrediting evolution. It's an attempt to prove a negative (that evolution is impossible) that fails on it's face.

On the other hand, the number of individual actions such as cell divisions, gene turn on/off actions, etc are so huge that to believe that an intelligence is controlling things at that detail is just not believable.

And since we don't see, hear, feel, or electronically measure an intelligence in action at any level, I don't think He exists.

There was some earlier discussion on astrology, and whether it is science. Perhaps since religion is attacking science, maybe science should turn some of it's attention to religion to see whether any of it's claims are valid.

I'm sure they will conclude that Jesus existed. But so did Mohammed. And I don't doubt they will find zero evidence for a deity, except in the emotions and faith of the believers.

173 posted on 08/15/2005 4:50:02 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: narby
You seem reasonably intelligent and informed when you post relative to "sciene" and aircrafts...but when you delve into topics associated with Christianity and the Bible, you always come up short!

History, archeology, Scripture, fulfilled prophecy, documented historical eye-witness account and etc....all side with the claims of Christianity.

180 posted on 08/15/2005 5:27:45 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson