[narby]

I do hope that this is a sarcastic reply in the same vein as the replies to detailed, informative posts from people like Ichneumon.

I'm just being honest. I really don't have time to read all that stuff.

I haven't seen a new point come out of the creationist crowd in, what, two years? And even then the points were 50 years or more old, I just hadn't heard them.

When I see bible verses used to attack science, it's just irrelevant at that point. If the poster doesn't understand that science can't operate in the supernatural realm, then the poster just doesn't have anything to say to me.

Sorry.

[Dimensio]

I really don't have time to read all that stuff.

When I don't, I skim through it and look for the most glaring errors, then expose those. When creationists offer up things, it's rarely difficult to find major flaws. MississippiMan, for example, brought up the red herring of textbook disclaimers even though ID pushers are demanding a hell of a lot more than that (and the disclaimers themselves have spurious justification).