ping
bump
bump
The day after Pirro's announcement, on Sean's show he asked her about the missing page 10. She laughed about it (which was great) and said the press demands a written statement so they can quote it. Said she much preferred to speak off-the-cuff but needed to stick to the statement for the presser. In short, there's no story to the missing page-10!
So what's up with this "missing page"? I'm assuming it's an innocent mistake about nothing Pirro made and Mrs. Greenspan is making way too much of it.
Andrea Mitchell's only wish is... before she dies... she gets her own stained, blue cocktail dress.
You gotta admit, Andrea "I love my artificial smile" Mitchell and company did a good job reading the script Hillary's handlers gave them. They must have rehearsed it Saturday evening.
This is like choosing between Lucifer and Satan.
Does it really frickin' matter? The more time the main stream media wants to waste on this election is fine by me. Both candidates suck. Both candidates embrace the culture of death. Let them beat each other into oblivion. It makes for great theatre.
"Given the comparison, I think Mrs. Clinton may bring out her husband as often as possible."
Now there's a busy sentence! (Given the) 'comparison'? (as compared to what?) I think (we know what you think) Mrs. Clinton (is she?) may (or may not) bring out (to display? isn't he busy?) her husband (is he?) as often as possible (wink wink, nudge nudge).
I love your posts! Political commentary as art.
|
Hillary in Aviary But the obsessively perfectionistic dodo wasn't able to fake even one wrong answer in the Letterman phony "pop quiz," a nostalgic electuary of "Twenty-One" fraud and (Groucho) Marxist left-wing crow. Instead, this documented incompetent with no apparent creative or analytic (not to mention thespian) skills gushed forth with a lame--"It's the bluebird--I know that" --globally exposing herself to be the corrupt clown that the sentient among us already know she is. It is no accident--and the Sheehy hagiography notwithstanding, it is certainly not because of any patriarchal society--that this reflexive kleptocrat never sought office. She never ran simply because she is a perfectionist and an incompetent who cannot tolerate personal (as opposed to bill-related) criticism, witness the prescreened, heavily controlled, sycophantic crowds, her pre-programmed, totally scripted appearances (or, alternatively, her totally mute "listening tour"), her unavailability to the press, indeed, her "bluebird." Thus, the question begging to be asked is this: Why would this compulsively perfectionistic grotesquerie allow herself to be unambiguously exposed as the utter incompetent and fraud and fool and horror that she is? And why would this self-proclaimed protector of "the children" prolong her own child's profound trauma by forcing her own bottom-heavy self, soiled in its own right, onto the political stage? The answer, I believe, resides more in liberty loss than in power gain. Simply put, she is not running for office; she is running from indictment. And I fear Starr successor, Robert Ray, is unable to catch her... Ray's recent statement , " I have been charged with responsibly conducting the work of this office. Some of my responsibility is to ensure that there is no untoward effect on the political process," both confirms and encourages this latest round of clinton raping, pillaging, despoiling, destroying. Will this nightmare never end?
"Bird of paradise" would have been a brilliant wrong answer for the New-York-state-bird question; in one fell swoop it would have flattered the necessary constituency, rendered hillary's cheating marginally believable and suggested a quick, secure, creative mind.
Or catch on. (On second thought, maybe the problem is that he does....)
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2000, 2005