Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OESY
The flatness or the "progressivity"* of the tax rates aren't the real problem. You could have very progressive tax rates with a postcard form: "How much did you make? Look that up on a table and send in your taxes". If the first half of the table is 10% and the second half is 80%, it isn't flat but it eliminates most of the problems with the current code.

You could also have the current nightmarishly complicated tax system with a single rate on you Adjusted Gross Income.

In the past couple of months I've had to deal more with taxes than I have in a long time. (No longer a W-2 employee, so I have to worry about estimated taxes now). More than ever I am a fan of the Fair Tax. No forms, no returns, no withholding for most people. Retailers just have to send in a percentage of their retail sales to the feds without worrying about how much was for food, clothing, medicine or any other things which aren't taxed in some state sales taxes.

*Progressive: Moving forward; advancing. Tending to become more severe or wider in scope, as of a disease or paralysis.

36 posted on 08/15/2005 7:15:18 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

And actually, keep in mind that all the flat tax plans keep in place the payroll taxes which are probably the most regressive part of the present system.


115 posted on 08/15/2005 10:44:28 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson