Posted on 08/15/2005 4:24:45 AM PDT by rdb3
Well before this I would not have called Hamilton a liar, however, I am now questioning his veracity in searching for the truth of what took place.
And what could possibly be in it for Czech Intel Officers to fabricate Atta's being in Prague? It's a neutral fact for them, one way or the other. Ignoring the veracity of the Czech's in favor of Atta's cell-phone records is adding farce to tragedy.
Sean Hannity is covering this right now on his program.
Sean Hannity is doing a great job covering this story.
The rest have dropped this story WITHOUT explanation.
ping
Drudge is losing it big time..hope he can correct but getting big has it's stings..
This story would be all over the old drudge site..
When a man says on Tuesday:
"The 9/11 commission did not learn of any U.S. government knowledge prior to 9/11 of surveillance of Mohamed Atta or of his cell," said Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana. "Had we learned of it, obviously it would've been a major focus of our investigation."
And then on Friday says: "only 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta was identified to them"
I would say that confirms he either lied on Tuesday or Friday. Regardless, he is a liar.
I do not disagree with you. Hamilton probably has not read much of what this commission compiled. He is an OLD man, selected for this role to give the air of credibility.
However, he is no Gorelick or Hillry just an useful idiot.
Well stated and welcome aboard.
The lie is the most used weapon in the arsenal of weapons of the criminal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.