Sorry I responded before seeing your list.
However paras 1066 and 1067 are pretty weak. For example being 90 miles from a city should easily allow a meeting to take place in a two day window.
Several of the other paras are just restatements, no additional details. Similarly, if Atta went to a couple of other countries en route to Prague, that would be very tough to uncover.
It would be a lot easier to believe that a thorough and reliable investigation had been produced if commissioner Gorlick hadn't had a major role. It didn't have to be this way. We need to know the truth so we can be sure that we have security.
I'm not saying that their arguments obviate Atta being in Praque. Just listing their other reasons. And that is probably not a definitive list, as it is just what comes back from that cluster.
If you go to the link, you can see that there are many other references to Atta (of course) and probably a lot more to his Prague visit. There is also a lot of documentation at the bottom, which I did not include.
I hope the Able Danger story is true. But so far it looks a little shaky. And you'll notice that some people are pulling back, like Podhoretz and NR. But they make mistakes too, of course.
What we need is a lot more details.