Replies

1. 200 is a teeny tiny fraction of what Darwinist evolution predicts - only a person of faith would consider this overwhelming evidence
2. Only bigots claim all people that disagree with them think and act in the same way.
3. I only represent me and your bigoted comment about the bogeymen you call "Creationists" does not apply.
4. This thread is about origin of life so I have no idea why you are doing a cut and paste of the Evolutionist party line . Evolution has nothing to say about the origin of life so your comments in this thread are pretty near nonsensical.

1. Speciation happens to smaller breakaway populations, so their resulting fossils SHOULD be fewer than from the large, successful parent population or the later, successful new species population. Darwin hinted at this, but it was in the 20th century that the mathematics behind it was firmed up. This is now well-established.

2. & 3. are as incoherent as Fester's post 60. Please, post on, both of ya!

4. Hmmmm. Who was it who said, in post 48, that "Yeah, evolution accurately describes the fossil record as we know it...Evolution describes a fossil record replete with transitional forms - unfortunately this fossil record does not exist"? (I leave the answer as an exercise for the reader. :-)

2. & 3. are as incoherent as Fester's post 60. Please, post on, both of ya!

Incoherent - you are the one posting the bigoted comments. Not a very "scientific" response unless you plan on presenting supporting evidence for your broad-brush unsupported claims.

4. Hmmmm. Who was it who said, in post 48, that "Yeah, evolution accurately describes the fossil record as we know it...

Nice try but next time read the entire thread unless you are trying to deceive. This is my first statement in that exchange:

"This thread is a about the origin of life, not Darwinist Evolution which BEGINS at a point in which life already exists and the mechanism to genetically pass on extremely complicated information has already been created.”

Speaking of incoherent - it amazes me that evo's play their cut and paste game in threads on origin of life when their beloved theory has absolutely nothing to say on the subject.