That makes absolutely no sense.
So you then do actually have some positive evidence for ID rather than just arguments against evolution? Otherwise your statement that it's EVO's that are guilty of just arguing against an opposing theory without providing evidence for their own is pretty ironic, wouldn't you say?
So you then do actually have some positive evidence for ID rather than just arguments against evolution? Otherwise your statement that it's EVO's that are guilty of just arguing against an opposing theory without providing evidence for their own is pretty ironic, wouldn't you say?