Posted on 08/14/2005 8:06:45 AM PDT by CarlEOlsoniii
So you then do actually have some positive evidence for ID rather than just arguments against evolution? Otherwise your statement that it's EVO's that are guilty of just arguing against an opposing theory without providing evidence for their own is pretty ironic, wouldn't you say?
So you then do actually have some positive evidence for ID rather than just arguments against evolution? Otherwise your statement that it's EVO's that are guilty of just arguing against an opposing theory without providing evidence for their own is pretty ironic, wouldn't you say?
What position does ToE take on *creation*?
Why are you asking me this question? I have never stated a position on ID. ID is a possible explanation for the origin of life. Since we currently don't know how life originated, we certainly don't how life did not originate.
Otherwise your statement that it's EVO's that are guilty of just arguing against an opposing theory without providing evidence for their own is pretty ironic, wouldn't you say?
I have never claimed Evo's argue against an opposing theory without providing evidence for their own. Irony level = zero.
None whatsoever. Creation simply isn't considered by the theory of evolution since creation is not a scientific idea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.