Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Anti-Bubba182
The article mentions the Gorelick "wall" was to protect Clinton in the China-gate fundraising scandal.

That's where any investigation of this should focus.To me that's the real story,not Atta.

9 posted on 08/13/2005 8:42:11 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing
The article mentions the Gorelick "wall" was to protect Clinton in the China-gate fundraising scandal.

Unlike the pathetically uninformed people who still get their info from the old media (which means they get NO info), informed people understand the wall was to protect the Clintons from the Chinagate treason. I used to think that 9/11 was an unfortunate side effect of that corruption.

However, there is one image I can't get out of my mind: the arrogant little prxck Podesta, almost drooling with glee, when he announced at the transition from Clintons to Bush that the Clintons had set up lots of "time bombs" for the new administration.

At the time I thought he meant the trashing of the WH, destruction of "W" keys on keyboards, etc. Now I'm beginning to wonder if three of those time bombs were delivered via 747s.

If that seems extreme, please tell me why, once you have accepted that Clintonistas like Gorelick facilitated the treason of transferring our national security to an enemy like Red China in return for illegal "campaign contributions", how is it a big leap to their facilitating a strike against our country by another (probably lesser) enemy like Al Qaeda?

19 posted on 08/13/2005 9:03:02 PM PDT by Sal (Devout Marxians work continually to make Marxianity the state religion of the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson