Welcome to FR.
A charge as strong as the one you've made deserves some supporting evidence.
Unfortunately I trashed (as it deserved) the letter but what Pryor said (as accurately as I can state it) was the charges made by Durbin were serious and probable enough to warrant further investigation ... blah blah blah.
Since I had made a specific request as to his opinion of the treasonous remarks by durbin - and he did not directly respond to that request - since I am not a lawyer, I take that as his agreement with durbin's remarks since he did NOT refute them.
If he did NOT agree with Durbin, he had his chance to say so. If he was to cowardly to respond honestly - that is his problem and his silence means complicity.