We could start with the abiogenesis crap in the high school textbooks under the heading Evolution: Origin of Life.
Yes, I know you will object that "how life came to be" is not "Darwinism," but the fact is, the heavyweights in Science Education curriculae in this country unanimously disagree with you. So unless you have a mind to write the first intelligent Biology text, go argue with them.
And how objective are you? Fallacy of Poisoning the Well.
Yes, I know you will object that "how life came to be" is not "Darwinism," but the fact is, the heavyweights in Science Education curriculae in this country unanimously disagree with you.
So unless you have a mind to write the first intelligent Biology text, go argue with them.
This assumes that none have been written. Unless you have read them all, every one, then this is an Assertion Without Proof.
There is no "Darwinism." This isn't about the limits of evidence for the Theory of Evolution but about the fact that despite all your screaming and wailing, there is absolutely none for ID.
The fact that life exists has a very clear implication for a mistake in the way we look at the Universe. The ID argument merely obscures this mistake because it provides an explanation that is incapable of verification or validation. It is functionally worthless.