Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting take on the current oil situation and on the measures to take.

Conservation Energy self reliance Use of the SPR (a suggestion made by some here) Alternative energy sources Voucher-based gas-distribution system

This last struck me as I had not seen it mentioned before. At first I thought rationing but it isn't that. Any idea how this would work?

1 posted on 08/13/2005 9:44:29 AM PDT by NYorkerInHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NYorkerInHouston
At first I thought rationing but it isn't that.

It is a form of rationing. Gov't control of distribution will itself cause shortages, and wouldn't be done unless there were also the other attributes of national mobilization for war such as the draft and price/wage controls.

2 posted on 08/13/2005 9:48:15 AM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston
?LOOKING AHEAD: OIL (By William F. Buckley Jr. )......"GASRON"
3 posted on 08/13/2005 9:54:20 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston

How about we try letting the market set the price in energy as in other commodities. It is efficient and apolitical. Alternative energy gets more interesting as the price of oil goes up doesn't it. It doesn't need tax money to support it when the market will do the job for less. And there are limited opportunities for graft and corruption. Vouchers - bah humbug, they are for socialists.


4 posted on 08/13/2005 9:57:03 AM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston

The free market will take care of this problem. Demand exceeds supply, price goes up, new resources become economically feasible the market adjusts, supply goes up, price goes down. On and on it goes.


10 posted on 08/13/2005 10:13:26 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston

I'm no scientist, but couldn't we, as history's greatest nation, figure out how to do the fusion power thing and once and for all free ourselves from these foreign and domestic enemies who have us by the energy cojones?

//and can't I, who normally writes rather well, compose less complex sentences?


12 posted on 08/13/2005 10:15:48 AM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston
That is an interesting article but it presumes that we live in a linear world and we don't...we live in a dynamic world wherein the negative results of the rising price of gasoline are, over time, offset by positive changes elsewhere in our economy and behavior.

For example, look at what the authors says here...

I paraphrase the author: Commuters suddenly forced to pay double for a gallon of gas begin to brown-bag their lunches, inching away from restaurants and sandwich shops. Americans who can still afford a vacation go on shorter trips, putting a major dent in the tourist industry.

With regard to commuters, think of the savings in time and money that would result from telecommuting. The biggest reason that telecommuting has not been adopted as yet has nothing to do with technology or worker productivity. It has to do with the way managers manage. Up til now, manager managed people. Telecommuting requires a shift to the management of production or output.

I personally have noticed a good many friends, family and acquaintences move to telecommuting in the last couple of years and the difference in the work lives and personal lives is significant. No commute saves time and stress and money. They are more productive in their work and have more time with their families. They have the freedom to live in less congested areas and save money on housing.

Of course, it doesn't work for everyone not even all white collar workers. Yet I have been amazed at the variety of positions that it does work for.

14 posted on 08/13/2005 10:20:45 AM PDT by Dark Skies (The storm is coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston

The current oil production shortage is a result of the monetar deflation caused by the Federal Reserve Board 1996-1999, which increased the dollar's value more than 50%. When the dollar is made more valuable, prices in dollars must be reduced. This caused a commodities price crash, including $10/bbl oil, which stopped any investment in oil production for about three years. Even now, with the Fed running the dollar, the oil industry doesn't know whether it is a safe bet to invest in production because what if the price falls back to $10/bbl in a couple of years?


17 posted on 08/13/2005 10:24:37 AM PDT by n-tres-ted (Remember November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston
HUH???

Strategic Petroleum Reserve "loans"???
"Voucher-based" gas rationing coupons??
"magnetic debit cards"???
"market incentives"???

Good grief...
William F. Buckley is nothing but another clueless, ivory-tower, techno-ignorant buffoon.

What we NEED is to build some more transportation infrastructure that isn't so g-dd-m petro-dependent.
Electric-powered mass-transit systems in our nation's most densely populated regions and urban areas. (light rail, high-speed rail and maglev.)
And start building some NUKES to supply the juice.

It's not a panacea, but I guarantee it'll help make us less dependent on oil than a bunch of stinkin' vouchers and magnetic debit cards.

Sheeeeesh...

23 posted on 08/13/2005 10:40:10 AM PDT by Willie Green (Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston

Even at $100 a barrel (which isn't likely at all) it wouldn't have much impact, except to keep lefties at home instead of driving their beaters out to the country and hugging trees.

It may increase the number of stills in the country though, as some of the poorer country folk start burning Al-kee-haul instead of gas. Store bought liquor sales may drop as well.


27 posted on 08/13/2005 10:46:46 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston

The quantity of oil in the SPR would not be enough to effect oil prices for more than a day or two. Then it would be gone and what would be gained? Edwin Edwards was governor of LA when the SPR was filled. What are the odds all of the oil is there anyway?


29 posted on 08/13/2005 10:48:50 AM PDT by Comus (Proud US taxpayer - supporting illegitimacy and sloth since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYorkerInHouston

And we are all overlooking one thing: THERE IS NO OIL SHORTAGE!! What we have is traders hedging up the price because of unfounded panic over Sadi oil which we only get 8-9% of our imported oil from. WE ARE BEING GOUGED, nothing more.


35 posted on 08/13/2005 10:55:41 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson