Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bazooka
"So, if the Stirling engine was invented in 1816, then why did it take 211 (!) years for somebody to realize the economic viability of the thing?"

Because they are relatively complex and unreliable. The Stirling engine used in this application has been under development for at least 30 years (I have a book about it that I bought about ten years ago). The new design uses magnetic bearings and a whole lot of other high-tech stuff that just didn't previously exist. In the book, the working fluid was helium. I wonder wy they switched to hydrogen???

22 posted on 08/13/2005 5:49:34 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog

I guess your comment about new materials and computer controls is the real answer to why stirling engines are seeing more use. Someone decided to try and use the old technology with updated processes and materials.


34 posted on 08/13/2005 7:46:45 AM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog

I wonder why they switched to hydrogen???

My guess would be cost.


107 posted on 08/13/2005 11:08:22 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (The government said it? I believe it! Hehe hoho haha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson