Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fewer kids, more immigration would strengthen U.S. (Shocking - honestly)
The Noblesville Ledger ^ | August 12, 2005 | Morton Marcus

Posted on 08/12/2005 7:06:43 PM PDT by Scythian

Posted 1:53 AM August 12, 2005
Morton Marcus column: Fewer kids, more immigration would strengthen U.S.
Society should invest in one or other to improve nation, guard resources.
 
By Morton Marcus
August 12, 2005
 

Morton Marcus
 
Customer service

 

This column may seem harsh to some readers; don't say you were not warned.

Could we reduce some of the major costs in our society if we had fewer children and more immigration from abroad? Think about it. Children, particularly those 15 to 19 years of age, are a major disruptive and expensive aspect of our nation. They establish behaviors that lead to lifelong misery for themselves and expenses for the rest of us.

Teens get into all sorts of costly trouble. They lead police on dangerous chases because they will not obey the law. Even when not evading the police, they are a threat to others on the road. They waste our resources by not applying themselves to their studies. Their tastes in clothing, music, movies and TV degrade our cultural standards.

Younger children offer moments of sweetness along with enormous expense in time, energy and resources. Yes, babies are cute, but they probably cause as much emotional anguish as they do joy. Children are insatiable consumers. Our efforts to please them involve vast expenditures on cereals, toys, games and clothes that contribute little to their or our long-term satisfaction or well-being.

There is an alternative to this squandering of our national resources. Encourage Americans to have fewer children and to develop policies of immigration that enhance our national well-being.

First, we would remove the token subsidies now given for parenthood. This means the income-tax exemptions for children would be deleted. Subsidies for child care would be eliminated. Even the current inadequate additions to welfare assistance for children would be dropped.

Second, health insurance would not cover pregnancy. Just as many believe that insurance should not cover medication for erectile dysfunction because it is a lifestyle problem, so too is pregnancy a lifestyle choice. Perhaps abortion or adoption of the child should be forced on any unmarried woman under age 21. Clearly, parental leave would be revoked.

In place of adding to our population with children we produce, we would import college-age adults. Specifically, careful recruitment by universities would bring the most talented and energetic English-speaking students from abroad to study in the United States. If their performance here is acceptable, they would be eligible for citizenship. Their initiative, inventiveness and income would help American businesses and contribute to Social Security. We would be putting our money where it would pay off better than in diapers.

Sentimentalists will oppose this rational solution to strengthening our nation's future. They will argue that it is against family values. But America is not built on families; its building block is the individual. We are a people who characteristically left their families behind and ventured out to somewhere else. Our heroes are celebrated as single persons, not as family members.

Of course, if we do not like this scenario, we could opt to invest in our children. We could consciously and deliberately turn them from liabilities into assets. This means changing how we spend money on young children and reducing the amount of discretionary funds teens have.

Foremost, an investment policy means a new approach to raising children. Our concern should be not just custodial care for the child nor merely satisfying the parents' desires. We would need to recognize that child rearing is an essential societal function.

Immediately, liberals and conservatives bristle at that last sentence. Both fear that government will impose its values on children and that parental control will be lost. The only difference between the liberals and conservatives is which set of values will be imposed by government.

However, as a society we are in agreement already on many aspects of good behavior. If we focused childhood (preschool) education on cooperation, self-control, respect for the rights of others, cleanliness, safety, plus appropriate speech and grammar, parents would not object. Unbending liberals and conservatives will continue to fry in their own juices, but our children would be more valuable to America.

Yes, with sufficient, appropriate child care and early education, we might have young children prepared to learn in school and teens who would not be a danger to themselves and our society.

Indiana economist Morton Marcus has studied and written about the Indiana economy for more than 30 years, during and after his long association with Indiana University. He lives on the north side of Indianapolis and can be reached by e-mail at morton_marcus@yahoo.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: farleft; leftistgarbage; whowritesthisbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Scythian
It's quite obvious it is. Nobody is so nutter to think the natives should not reproduce, and just continually import college age folks from abroad, who should also not reproduce, so that we extirpate from the public square adolescents, those lawless and ever expensive over testosteroned or estrogoned Id driven ones. Give me a break, and get a clue. It is sort of like that Jonathon Swift novel. You remember that one don't you, A Modest Proposal, suggesting that the Irish should cannibalize themselves to at once "solve" the over population and hunger problem?
41 posted on 08/12/2005 7:31:14 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?
42 posted on 08/12/2005 7:38:58 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

What drugs was this imbecile on when he wrote this?


43 posted on 08/12/2005 7:42:05 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
..... I vote to keep the kids and shoot all the old, fat, ugly people.

Whew! I'm not fat .... otherwise, close call!

44 posted on 08/12/2005 7:42:44 PM PDT by gnawbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Torie

A Modest Proposal


45 posted on 08/12/2005 7:46:05 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

The Shakers live.


46 posted on 08/12/2005 7:48:42 PM PDT by junta (Is Mexico an ally in the WOT?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
Our efforts to please them involve vast expenditures on cereals, toys, games and clothes that contribute little to their or our long-term satisfaction or well-being.

Mr. Morton Marcus, I dont think you will grow if you were denied of these things by your parents.But there must be something wrong with the cereal fed on you - your not "well" recently.

47 posted on 08/12/2005 7:49:37 PM PDT by ChristianDefender (If you can't fight with M16/M4.. then use prayer, if not just choose whose side are You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: junta

And then I read the whole article. Perhaps he is a bit oblique, but his point is made, less ideology more manners.


48 posted on 08/12/2005 7:52:10 PM PDT by junta (Is Mexico an ally in the WOT?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

later maybe pingout.


49 posted on 08/12/2005 7:53:47 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Garden variety neo-malthusianism. The is the underlying philosophy of Planned Parenthood.


50 posted on 08/12/2005 7:56:25 PM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Is this guy trying to be funny or is he just so absurd that he seems funny?

Seem's kind of like a poorly written Swift knockoff until the end. Can't tell whether he is serious or not.

51 posted on 08/12/2005 7:59:35 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Remember the king in "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" who outlawed children and had a child catcher?
52 posted on 08/12/2005 8:18:37 PM PDT by fallujah-nuker (Atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: fallujah-nuker

I had nightmares for months about that child catcher. "I SMELL CHILDREN......"


53 posted on 08/12/2005 8:19:25 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (There will be no bad talk or loud talk in this place. CB Stubblefield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
he had the candy wagon that turned into a paddy wagon.
54 posted on 08/12/2005 8:20:26 PM PDT by fallujah-nuker (Atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fallujah-nuker

Aaaarrrghhhhh! I've had too much pizza and I'm bound to have nightmares all over again!!!


55 posted on 08/12/2005 8:21:10 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (There will be no bad talk or loud talk in this place. CB Stubblefield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

What a friggin MORON!


56 posted on 08/12/2005 8:24:05 PM PDT by loboinok (Gun Control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Wow! This is exactly the same strategy that Western Europe is pursuing all on its own, without any need for a government mandate. Stop having babies, import Muslims to the tune of 900,000 a year... and see if your country can go extinct by the end of the century.


57 posted on 08/12/2005 8:26:08 PM PDT by Numidian Horse (Numidian Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

typical elitist pointy head


if only the people of the world would let "brilliant" men like him run their lives, we would quickly see how much better off the planet was


58 posted on 08/12/2005 8:27:57 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
A rather confusing parody. At the end he should make it more obvious that he was talking nonsense. What makes this so scary is that many didn't catch that this is a parody. Not because they're dumb, but because this sounds like something a true liberal might actually suggest! I wouldn't be a bit surprised if many liberals were for limiting the amount of children a family could have or if they were in favor of aborting all pregnancies in which the mother is under 21. The left is becoming quite horrifying and some may actually like these ideas.
59 posted on 08/12/2005 8:33:51 PM PDT by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 05 Mustang GT Rocks

"This dude needs to be aborted."

It'd just be a "late term" abortion, nothing wrong with that right?


60 posted on 08/12/2005 8:55:14 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (The presence of "peace" is the absence of opposition to socialism -- Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson