Posted on 08/12/2005 3:36:24 AM PDT by familyop
The Arabic word indihar is being used these days by Palestinians who view Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank as a victory for the al-Aksa intifada, which erupted in September 2000. And there appears to be a growing number of Palestinians who are truly convinced that the pullout is nothing but a retreat achieved through the blood of thousands of shahids, or martyrs. Still, many also consider it a conspiracy designed to tighten Israel's grip on the West Bank and Jerusalem.
The Hans Wehr Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic translates indihar as "banishment and defeat." Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders in the Gaza Strip were the first to refer to the disengagement as a "fruit of the resistance attacks" against Israel over the past few years. In recent days, even senior Palestinian officials have begun labeling the pullout as an Israeli defeat.
On the streets of Ramallah and other West Bank cities, Palestinians across the political spectrum were unanimous this week in defining the disengagement as a retreat in the face of rocket and suicide attacks. Only a few said they regarded the move as a direct result of the peace process and international pressure on Israel.
"Of course this is a victory for the blessed intifada," boasted Samir Tahayneh, a 22-year-old university student who describes himself as a Fatah supporter. "Had it not been for the Kassam rockets and suicide bombings, Israel would never have thought of running away from our lands. The disengagement proves that the only way to liberate our lands is through the resistance, and not at the negotiating table."
Scores of people interviewed over the past week in various parts of the West Bank echoed similar sentiments.
"We have always said that the only language the Jews understand is force," commented Ala Abu Jbarra, a 30-year-old shopkeeper. "The Oslo process did not give us as much as the second intifada. By God's will, we will pursue the struggle until we liberate the rest of our lands."
A survey conducted by the Hamas-affiliated Palestine Information Center Web site found that over 94 percent of Palestinians see the Israeli indihar in the Gaza Strip as an "achievement for the Palestinian resistance." Less than 6% of the 2,551 respondents said they viewed the withdrawal as a result of political negotiations and international pressure.
THE QUESTION on the Palestinian street now is who will take credit for expelling Israel from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank? Both Hamas and the ruling Fatah party are separately preparing mass celebrations in the "liberated" areas with the hope that each can claim responsibility for driving Israel out of the Palestinian territories.
In an attempt to circumvent Hamas, Fatah leaders earlier this week kicked off celebrations over the pullout by holding two mass rallies in the Gaza Strip. The message emanating from the rallies was that the disengagement is the result of the "sacrifices" made by Fatah fighters during the intifada. At another rally in Ramallah, organized by the Palestinian Authority's Political Guidance Commission, Palestinian leaders hailed the disengagement as a significant victory for the "resistance."
Col. Ribhi Mahmoud, acting director of the Political Guidance Commission, welcomed the Israeli indihar as a first step toward liberating Jerusalem. He and several spokesmen who addressed the rally drew parallels between the disengagement and the IDF "retreat" from Lebanon in May 2000.
"Palestinian blood has defeated the mighty sword of Israeli occupation," declared Sheikh Hassan Youssef, the de facto Hamas leader in the West Bank. "Our blood has forced Israel to abandon its strategy of occupation, just as the Lebanese did."
Qais Abdel Karim, a top leader of the Marxist-Leninist Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, told the crowd that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was forced to take the decision to leave the Gaza Strip and parts of the West Bank because of stiff Palestinian resistance.
"Sharon was forced to announce the so-called disengagement under the pressure of Palestinian steadfastness and resistance," he said, drawing thunderous applause. "This is the first time that Israel is forced to dismantle Jewish settlements established on Palestinian lands."
Abdullah al-Ifranji, a senior Fatah activist in the Gaza Strip, said the majority of Palestinians view the withdrawal as a "fruit of four years of the second intifada." But, he added, the disengagement is also seen as the result of "tremendous political efforts" made by Yasser Arafat and his successor, Mahmoud Abbas.
Ifranji admitted that his party was engaged in a competition with Hamas over post-disengagement celebrations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
"In the past six months, Hamas has prepared 40,000 military uniforms, 70,000 green flags and 100,000 hats," he claimed. "They have also bought dozens of jeeps and painted them in Hamas's color – green. They want to appear as if they were the ones who liberated the Gaza Strip."
On the other hand, Fatah has prepared only Palestinian flags that will be distributed to Palestinians celebrating the disengagement. However, various Fatah militias in the Gaza Strip have already announced that they will hold paramilitary marches in the settlements after they are evacuated.
Hamas officials claim that the PA has allocated millions of dollars for the Fatah-orchestrated celebrations, with most of the money coming from European donors. According to a senior Hamas official in the Gaza Strip, the European Union has decided to finance the Fatah celebrations with the hope that the message to the Palestinian public would be that the disengagement is a victory for the peace process, not terrorism.
"Of course the Palestinian people are not na ve and no one will buy this argument," said the Hamas official. "Even Abu Mazen (Mahmoud Abbas) knows deep inside that the withdrawal is the result of the resistance operations, but he can't say this in public."
Many Palestinians are worried that the presence of thousands of Hamas and Fatah gunmen in the emptied settlements after the disengagement, along with some 20,000 Palestinian policemen, will lead to violent clashes. Hence Abbas's repeated calls to the Palestinians over the past few days for calm during and after the pullout.
Aware of the fact that the Palestinian security forces would not be able to stop the Hamas supporters from reaching the settlements in the Gaza Strip, Abbas met this week with the Islamic movement's leaders and implored them to restrain their men. The two sides agreed to set up joint committees to oversee the celebrations and avoid internecine fighting.
Yet Abbas, like many Palestinians, knows that a confrontation of some sort with Hamas is almost inevitable.
His agreement to form joint committees with Hamas is seen as capitulation to demands set by the movement. Until last week, Abbas had adamantly refused to even talk about such coordination with Hamas.
"We in Fatah are not seeking a clash with Hamas," explained Ifranji, the Fatah leader from the Gaza Strip. "We are saying that Palestinian blood is a red line that should not be crossed. On the other hand, we won't accept a situation where Hamas would try to harm or undermine the Palestinian Authority."
The fact that an enormous number of Palestinians see the disengagement as a reward for violence and as indihar has many Palestinian officials in Ramallah and Gaza City extremely worried.
"I'm afraid that the disengagement, which is not being carried out as a result of peace talks, will weaken the moderate camp among the Palestinians," said a top Abbas aide. "That's why we need to work together with Israel and the international community to make this move appear as if it were part of the peace process."
Instead of the nation building imagined by Bush's misplaced vision, the "palestinians" are inspired by the Gaza withdrawal to be thinking, dreaming and planning destruction!
And one reason is that the US's glad-handing swag competes among the Palis with the evil Saudi and Iranian oil moola. Our influence over the Palis is minimal because of the oil money turned to evil ends by the inmans and mullahs of hate.
I don't quite understand what to make of your point in re that. That it required repricocity? The Saudi's are smart enough to know that documents can say one thing, and actuality -- here oil money -- another.
I don't imagine that Bush is fooled by the Palestinians and the terrorists.
I highly suspect that the withdrawal is a first step toward demonstrating that the so-called occupation of Palestinian lands is not the source of the problem.
First Israel withdraws. The Palestinians up the ante and attack Israel again, regardless - now citing that Israel is an illegal occupation of Palestinian lands.
At that point, the hammer comes down after the first major terrorist incident and a real occupation takes place with a full coalition with the express purpose of rooting out the terrorists and their organizations.
Some would say these are the signs of the end of days. The real question is, whose end?
..........................................
I like the Book of Tobit and wish there were some, any, deep commentaries on it. The protagonist, with the help of an angel, defeats an evil angel who is then banished to the wilderness. Fish bile dissolves eye cataracts. Fish never close their eyes.
---"Of course this is a victory for the blessed intifada," boasted Samir Tahayneh,---
Sure it is, you stupid little schmuck. If delusions were wealth, the Palestinians would be the richest people on the planet.
No, I suspect he is fooled by himself. That's the case for most high-quality people. Not so subect to external faults because he has worked hard to better himself, he is still subject -- like all of us -- to our internalized faults, which are much harder to properly channel.
I am one or two identical posts away from having my head explode.
What you and other similarly write is total undiluted 100% prime crap.
Yesterday, on the same day he told Israelis that withdrawal was good, he was explaining that a withdrawal from Iraq would be rewarding terror.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.