Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nycfree

Pirro will weaken Hillary's powerhold on NY voters and diminish the effect of Hillary cult's supportive propaganda. Pirro is a much better speaker than Hillary. Hillary at ad lib spontaneously projects her true inverted ideation and agenda. No matter the issues, Pirro upstages Hillary spotlighting the fact that Hillary Clinton is NOT the smartest woman in the world. While Hillary is transparently duplicitious, Pirro is assertive and firmly set. Pirro has an excellent speaking presence and communicative skills far superior to Hillary's convoluted NEWSPEAK screech and harrange. Pirro will effectively counter, or should I say, prosecute Hillary?


26 posted on 08/12/2005 3:49:36 AM PDT by purpleland (Vigilance and Valour!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: purpleland
Bump! Excellent. Looking at it from a slightly different vantage point:

We could not have conjured up a more perfect counterpoint to the rapist clintons than prosecutor-of-rapists extraordinaire,
Jeanine Pirro. Her presence in the race will serve as a constant reminder to the voter that the clintons are rapists, terrorizers,
that the clintons are serial abusers of women.

 

thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson


The closest that President Clinton has ever come to answering allegations that he raped an Arkansas woman in 1978 is a distance measurable only in light-years. After Juanita Broaddrick made the accusation in 1999, the president's attorney, David Kendall, alone answered, saying any such charges were "absolutely false." Of course, attorney Robert Bennett believed Mr. Clinton when he said he hadn't had sex with Monica Lewinsky and defended the president then on no less sturdy grounds. Thus while lawyers can spare Mr. Clinton awkward moments at the podium in which he has to say, "I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky" or "I did not fondle that woman, Kathleen Wlley" or "I did not rape that woman, Mrs. Broaddrick," their comments are, in effect, non-denial denials.

Mia T, 6.11.05
CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN:Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick?


30 posted on 08/12/2005 4:48:46 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: purpleland

Two summers ago, Hill took speech lessons and thus no longer says 'uh' and 'ya know' every six seconds. That aside, she'll definitely be in trouble during the primaries since she can't take the heat or serious debate. Never fear, though, Hillary fans, she can do the 'don't answer direct questions' ploy, otherwise known as fogging, in her sleep. Fasten seat belts. Bette Davis was right about bumpy nights.


42 posted on 08/12/2005 5:49:46 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: purpleland

Alll Pirro has to do is shrink Hillary's margin of victory to 5% and she "wins." Hillary's credibility as a Presidential vote getter will be severely damaged...and that's the "victory" that Pirro can win...if she does that, she can write her own ticket politically with the GOP.

Pirro is more telegenic, just as smart, and has a no-bull attitude...I look forward to their debates.


55 posted on 08/12/2005 8:35:20 AM PDT by Bushbacker (f----u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson