Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
How do you account for the line traits (shovel-shaped incisors, etc.) in Peking Man which persisted through to modern Mongoloids?

From the article (Excoffier's hypothesis):

"A small number of those fledgling people then migrated to Asia. As the population expanded, separate groups formed in different areas...Some ancestral genes could have been carried out of Africa, while being lost within Africa. That would explain why Asians carry much older stretches of DNA than Africans do."

That would seem it would also explain the shovel-shaped incisors. They were present in the ancestoral population in Africa, but later lost.

28 posted on 08/11/2005 8:10:42 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity
That would seem it would also explain the shovel-shaped incisors. They were present in the ancestoral population in Africa, but later lost.

I have never heard of any sizeable (>2-3%) numbers of shovel-shaped incisors in Africa. I am still confused. I understand the Lapps or some group in that area had a slightly higher percentage, but the real mother-lode is in the Mongolian group, and in Peking Man. Help?!?

29 posted on 08/11/2005 8:13:35 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Is this a good tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson