1 posted on
08/11/2005 2:42:14 PM PDT by
Happy2BMe
To: Happy2BMe
Did they arrest the illegals after the trial?
To: Dane; bayourod
""We are delighted the Ninth Circuit has rejected this naked attempt to place the interests of illegal immigrants ahead of the democratic will of U.S. citizens in Arizona," said Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform." ======================================
IYO - should FAIR be the ones taking credit for this 9th Circuit of Appeals decision to limit public services to illegal aliens?
3 posted on
08/11/2005 2:44:06 PM PDT by
Happy2BMe
(Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
To: Happy2BMe
Is this a mistake? The NINTH Circus Circuit?
I'd best read the details.
4 posted on
08/11/2005 2:44:12 PM PDT by
onyx
(North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: Happy2BMe
Illegal Aliens Lack Legal Standing And from the "water is wet" department...
5 posted on
08/11/2005 2:44:17 PM PDT by
TheBigB
(Gum would be perfection!)
To: Happy2BMe
Ninth circuit finally does something right?
I think it just froze over....
6 posted on
08/11/2005 2:44:46 PM PDT by
konaice
To: Happy2BMe
get outta here... Ninth Circus finally sides with the American People? Hell has frozen over I hear...
8 posted on
08/11/2005 2:46:55 PM PDT by
Cinnamon
To: Happy2BMe
"MALDEF, ACLU and the government of Mexico intend to take this to the Supreme Court, and even to the U.N."
ACLU & Mexican government collaboration = outrageous,
but taking it to the UN is laughable.
10 posted on
08/11/2005 2:47:37 PM PDT by
onyx
(North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: Happy2BMe
"MALDEF, ACLU and the government of Mexico intend to take this to the Supreme Court, and even to the U.N." WTF?
The UN has precedence over US Courts?
11 posted on
08/11/2005 2:48:58 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: Happy2BMe
Is this from Scrappleface? This can't be true! I've never seen a single sane and common sense decision out of that court.
14 posted on
08/11/2005 2:53:02 PM PDT by
Ron in Acreage
(It's the borders stupid! "ALLEN IN 08")
To: Happy2BMe
....and if you think we are stunned by the 9th's decision...imagine the lefties and illegals supporting this piece of trash suit.
15 posted on
08/11/2005 2:53:31 PM PDT by
GLH3IL
(What's good for America is bad for liberals.)
To: Happy2BMe
Does this fall under the heading of even a broken clock is right twice a day?
This from the 9th Circuit? Wow.
To: Happy2BMe
Thank you for NOT unnecessarily excerpting this article.
22 posted on
08/11/2005 3:16:45 PM PDT by
upchuck
("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: Happy2BMe
The San Francisco-based court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked the "legal standing" necessary to challenge the initiative approved by Arizona voters in November 2004.This conclusion should not be surprising considering the plaintiffs are a bunch of criminals.
Duh?
23 posted on
08/11/2005 3:20:02 PM PDT by
upchuck
("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: Happy2BMe
Wait a minute, the 9th circuit? The most liberal circuit court in this nation? Wow. Just...wow.
26 posted on
08/11/2005 9:05:35 PM PDT by
trubluolyguy
(If you think that's tough, try losing a testicle in a knife fight with your mother!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson