I need to read "The Third Terrorist" - I admit I have resisted it because I don't like to consider "unproven conspiracy theories" where I have no basis for really knowing what's true and what's not....
This stuff with Snell raises the possibility that various people in both FBI and DOJ/US Attys have been (1) unbelievably negligent and idiotic, and (2) some of them are actively involved in criminal cover-ups relating to 9/11, OKC, TWA 800, and WTC '93..... yet, it seems amazing that there should still be no 'insider' whistle-blower ala Coleen Rowley, especially for the NYC offices where everyone must have known people killed in 9/11.
That's a good point about the whistle blower angle.
However, I think that there is just no way to "prove" a lot of this stuff. It's not like there is a tape recording or a memo where it's all outlined by the Clintonistas to ignore this stuff.
Although I have seen some under oath testimony that people have been told to shut it down, meaning the OKC probe into Islamic or Iraqi involvement.
Re Jayna's book...I resisted reading it too and for the same reasons. I have never read that stuff by conspiracy theorists because I don't believe most of it.
Her book isn't conspiracy theory though and is based on solid research and I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. When I read that Woolsey endorsed her work, I decided to buy the book and I've never regretted it.